Trapped at Sea: China’s Gray Zone Quagmire in the South China Sea
Trapped at Sea: China’s Gray Zone Quagmire in the South China Sea
By The Security Nexus
One of the cardinal rules in the art of statecraft is to never trap yourself in a strategic posture that leaves no room for recalibration. Yet, this is precisely the dilemma in which China now finds itself in the South China Sea.
For over a decade, China has employed gray zone tactics—coercive actions like ramming vessels, deploying maritime militias, using lasers and water cannons, and building artificial islands—to assert sovereignty over contested waters. These actions have operated below the threshold of war, but above that of normal diplomatic behavior. The goal was clear: solidify Beijing’s control incrementally while avoiding direct military confrontation with more powerful rivals like the United States.
But now, Beijing’s gambit appears to be faltering.
The Turning Tide
Despite commanding the region’s largest naval and coast guard fleet and pioneering gray zone operations, China has struggled to achieve meaningful strategic gains over the past year. Nations like Vietnam and the Philippines have not backed down. On the contrary, they’ve doubled down.
Vietnam has dramatically expanded land reclamation activities in the Spratly Islands and deepened security ties with the United States and India. The Philippines, despite enduring dangerous harassment of its resupply missions to the Sierra Madre outpost, has responded with transparency campaigns and international partnerships. Notably, Manila has committed to purchasing U.S. F-16s and deploying advanced missile systems from the U.S.—a clear escalation in response to Chinese belligerence.
Strategic Overreach
Rather than isolating rival claimants, China’s tactics have drawn them closer to the United States and each other. Malaysia and Indonesia continue hydrocarbon exploration in their exclusive economic zones (EEZs), brushing off Chinese protests. Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Quad are now investing more heavily in regional maritime domain awareness and defense cooperation.
Even China’s economic weight—its most effective lever in Southeast Asia—has not been enough to reverse this trend. Smaller states are increasingly willing to absorb economic risks to push back against maritime coercion, buoyed by diversified economic partnerships and increasing global scrutiny of Chinese tactics.
A Strategic Dead-End
Beijing’s reluctance to de-escalate is rooted in political dogma and domestic nationalism. The Party line refuses to acknowledge any error, insisting China is reclaiming what is historically its own. Compromise is framed as capitulation. Any perceived backing down, especially over national sovereignty, is unthinkable within Xi Jinping’s political calculus.
However, this intransigence has strategic consequences. The South China Sea, once envisioned as a bastion of Chinese influence, now threatens to become a quagmire. The Philippines’ refusal to vacate Second Thomas Shoal, Vietnam’s naval buildup, and U.S. escort offers all raise the stakes. And with the Biden-to-Trump transition potentially reshaping U.S. policy, China may find itself misjudging deterrence thresholds once again.
Policy Implications
From a national security perspective, the United States must continue investing in maritime resilience, partner capacity building, and multilateral transparency initiatives. Persistent presence operations, non-lethal countermeasures, and coordinated naval support from allies are proving more effective than direct confrontation.
Equally important is messaging. Regional publics are increasingly aware of gray zone coercion. Shining a light on these tactics—via embedded journalists, video evidence, and social media—erodes Beijing’s plausible deniability and global credibility.
China’s challenge is no longer to assert dominance—it is to find a way out of a strategy that has delivered neither peace nor control.
——
1. Roy, Denny. “China Is Trapped in the South China Sea ‘Gray Zone.’” 19FortyFive, May 2025. https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/05/china-is-trapped-in-the-south-china-sea-gray-zone/.
2. University of Navarra. “China and Naval Power: Navigating the Gray Zone.” Global Affairs, 2023. https://en.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/china-y-el-poder-naval-navegando-en-la-zona-gris.
3. The Maritime Issues. “Gray Zone Challenges in the East and South China Sea.” maritimeissues.com, 2023. http://www.maritimeissues.com/.
4. Pedrozo, Raul (Pete). “Narrowing ‘The Gap’: Counter Gray Zone Operations.” International Law Studies 103 (2024): 364–383.
5. Samaranayake, Nilanthi, and Lisa Curtis. Countering Coercion: Managing Chinese Gray Zone Activity in the South China Sea and Indian Ocean Region. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security, 2024.
6. SeaLight. “The Silent Struggle: Countering China’s Gray Zone Operations in the South China Sea.” SeaLight.live, 2024. https://www.sealight.live/posts/the-silent-struggle-countering-china-s-gray-zone-operations-in-the-south-china-sea.
7. RAND Corporation. Understanding and Countering China’s Maritime Gray Zone Operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2954-1.html.
8. Sengupta, Prasun K. “China Is Building ‘Bastions’ in Its Coastal Waters as Against Open-Ocean Patrols.” Force India, March 2024. https://forceindia.net/feature-report/beneath-the-surface/.
