Your Compass in the Security Nexus


Counterintelligence for the Cloud: Treat Your Hyperscaler Like Contested Terrain

Cloud counterintelligence treats hyperscale and GovCloud environments as contested terrain. The decisive fights happen at tenant boundaries, privileged access, telemetry integrity, and insider-risk enforcement. Build for constrained privilege (JIT), durable visibility (tamper-resistant telemetry), and compartmented blast radius—then continuously verify. Read More…

Militarized Policing and the Civil Liberties Trap

Militarization reshapes policing from service provision toward coercive governance. Empirical evidence does not consistently show crime or safety benefits, while multiple strands of research and rights analysis indicate escalation, legitimacy loss, and chilling effects on lawful civic participation. The policy solution is governance: tighten transfer rules, raise deployment thresholds, restrict biometric surveillance of protest, and require operational transparency. Read More…

Open Source Naval Order of Battle

Commercial maritime sensing has made it easier to build naval order-of-battle estimates from open sources. AIS provides identity and patterns but is vulnerable to spoofing and manipulation. SAR detects ships regardless of cooperation, and fusion approaches exploit mismatches between AIS and imagery to identify anomalies and “dark ships.” Commercial RF mapping can add another layer of behavioral evidence when AIS goes silent. States should counter OSINT by reducing adversary inference through emission discipline, selective disclosure, AIS governance, and better internal sharing, rather than defaulting to overclassification. Read More…

Rails Without Borders: How Cross Border Dependencies Turn Rail Networks into Cascading Risk Machines

International rail networks become uniquely vulnerable at borders because critical flows concentrate into a few corridors and ports of entry, while operational interdependencies (services, rolling stock, crew) turn local constraints into network-wide delay cascades. The most effective countermeasures combine cross-border governance (shared playbooks, joint incident command, mutual aid) with technical resilience (slack capacity, modular operations, predictive monitoring, network-aware rerouting, and cyber-physical hardening), all aimed at preventing constraint overload and shortening time spent in cascade mode. Read More…

How Secure Is U.S. Passenger Rail, And What Does “Critical Rail Infrastructure Security” Look Like?

U.S. passenger rail is an open network. Airport-style checkpoints do not scale across hundreds of stations and platforms. Effective security is layered and intelligence led: visible policing and K9 presence, randomized checks, strong reporting and intel sharing, and fast incident response and recovery. The real high-leverage work sits in the cyber-physical stack that moves trains safely: signals, interlockings, dispatch, power, and communications. The post lays out a clean threat model, clarifies federal and operator roles for “critical rail,” and closes with practical guidance for travelers as well as feasible improvements for policymakers and operators. Read More…